Energy and “Climate Change” Link via Greenhouse Gases
Energy is the basis of economic growth and economic growth is essential for human development because it is necessary to maintain the world wide Ponzi scheme based on debt to just a few families, which debt controls our economic growth.
“The world needs a new model of how to generate a rising standard of living that’s not dependent on a pyramid scheme,”Nobel laureate Steven Chu said at the University of Chicago.
The dynasties that control the pyramid scheme have always owned and controlled all the energy sources and production methods to date, viz. coal, petrol or gas and electricity production and insist that most of our debt to them be used to pay for our energy consumption, because energy is the basis of economic growth which is essential for human development. And to underline that principal, the world economy is based on ever-increasing population growth.
What they don’t tell us via their wholly owned and controlled worldwide media outlets and what governments won’t face, is that it is a scheme that makes sustainability impossible and is therefore likely to fail.
In the past, they used to insist that all our generated wealth and taxes owed to them, be paid towards weapons (developed and owned by them), to fight their enemies and save the world that way. But now they realize that war is obsolete.
I guess you could say we are lucky to be just saving the world from so-called “climate change” now , while they still get to inherit all our wealth, regardless.
They are telling us, via their fully controlled media outlets, that although energy is the basis of economic growth, its production is causing greenhouse gases which is causing climate change, and its all our fault.
That is, despite the fact that the climate is changing rapidly on all the planets in our solar system. In our case, it is due to our weakening magnetic field caused by the sun’s cyclical geomagnetic excursions which is what is causing the changes in all the planets in our solar system.
Most Climatologists are now not assuming that clouds trap heat but they are correctly assuming that clouds reflect sunlight and trigger rapid glaciations. This is what the cyclical geomagnetic excersion will likely cause based on previous cyclical excursions, although not quite as fast as The Day After Tomorrow.
No wonder the name was changed from ‘global warming’ last decade. Seems as though they figured it out, but they are not about to tell us that reducing carbon is their next golden egg and our next economic destruction. And for no reason apart from their greed and need to cause misery to appease their god. Sure the climate is changing and rapidly, but not from carbon emissions causing greenhouse gases.
NCAR scientist Andrew Gettelman, said in response to the observed slight warming of the planet during lockdown: “Pollution cools the planet, so it makes sense that pollution reductions would warm the planet.” In other words: pollution is causing global cooling which is more in line with a projected new ice age. And reducing carbon emissions will surely exacerbate drowning the South Pacific islands which is the very thing that causes people to protest in the streets in New Zealand to reduce carbon emissions. Duh!
Today, 11 April 2021, it was revealed yet again that Current Climate Model Simulations Significantly Overestimate Future Sea-Level Rise. But do not expect that this will reach the mainstream media. They will continue to scare the children and other ill-educated people into believing that all the South Sea islands will go underwater if we don’t pay trillions in carbon tax to the black sun worshippers.
Is Non-Polluting Free Energy Possible?
At least that would save bankrupting nearly all the world’s employers by forcing the draconian carbon tax which is touted as necessary to save the planet. Because, after all, energy is the basis of economic growth. And unless our debt-economy is in debt it will crash, like it did in September 2019.
The way out of the giant influx of cash into the debt economy, causing the crash in September 2019, was to unleash the 14 year “gain in pathogenesis” and “gain in function“ trials performed on the SARS coronavirus1 virus that originated in the horseshoe bat.
The trials were performed at North Carolina University, Chapel Hill, NC, United States from 2005 to 2019, by a team led by Professor Shi Zhengli from Wuhan Institute of Virology. But no-one seems to know how the virus escaped the laboratory, although evidence shows it happened before 1 October 2019 and not in the Wuhan Markets. The first of those cases were reported at the end of December, 2019.
The gain in pathogenesis and gain in function studies were jointly funded by the Chinese and US Governments. As we all know, when the genetically engineerd virus was released, the world was “forced” into a lockdown. Subsequently, all Governments were “forced” to borrow trillions to be able to offer handouts to the affected taxpayers and social benefits recipients, viz. everyone. And eh violà!, no more economic crash due to cash injections exceeding debt that happened in September 2019. Debt was once again in full swing and so the economy was in “balance”.
Free Energy for Economic Growth
But, we are talking about energy being the basis of economic development. So what the writer means by ‘free’ is not about the cost of harnessing and supply, for which one might reasonably expect to pay, but ‘free’ in the sense that Nicola Tesla (1856-1943) meant when he said:
This new power for the driving of the world’s machinery will be derived from the energy which operates the universe, the cosmic energy, whose central source for the earth is the sun and which is everywhere present in unlimited quantities. Radiant Energy System
And somewhat like the ancient Egyptians are said to have used.
Anyone who has visited the Valley of the Kings in Luxor, and followed the long, dark, twisting passages leading to the painted and sculptured walls depicting the Pharaoh’s life and eventually leading to his tomb, will wonder at the total lack of any soot on the pristine limestone walls and ceiling; and the intensity of the colour of the thousands of years’ old paint on the walls and ceilings.
It would be pitch dark that far in without a good light source to create such splendid art. And chances are it was freely available electricity that was used for light (and for the massive amounts of evidence of high speed drilling elsewhere), based on the paintings and reliefs of extremely large globes, or possibly phase conjugating plasma tubes, found in Hathor temple at Dendera; and on the notion of a God electric nature of the cosmos which was understood by the ancient Egyptians and is understood by the Thunderbolts Project today.
Free Non-Polluting Energy Possibilities
A short list of some of the choices we have today, for “free”, unmetered energy, includes:
- Scalar energy
- Neutrinovoltaic Energy
- PAPP Engine which uses free zero point energy and a small amount of noble gases
- Radio frequency energy
- Electro magnetic energy
- Swiss M-L converter/Permanent magnet propulsion system
- Magnet Current Apparatus (Magnetstromapparat)
- Electro magnetic harvester for under $15
- Free magnetic energy
- Cold Fusion What is cold fusion?
- Hydrogen obtained from electrolysis of water
- Antimatter-catalyzed nuclear pulse propulsion
- Thermo Electric Anti-matter Reactor
- Vril power
- “The Electric Sky“, Donald E. Scott
Non-polluting Renewable Energy
Or at least more efficient, renewable energy like:
Nicola Tesla (1856-1943)
“No free energy device will ever be allowed to reach the market.” Nicola Tesla (1856-1943
A century ago, Tesla attempted to interest the US government in his wire-free scalar energy and when he failed, the Russians and Germans asked him to work for them, but he turned them down.
Then in 1943 he proposed to FDR that we should look carefully at the fact that we can get all the energy we need from any space we happen to be in.
But the ruling class elite feared that since Einstein was able to influence FDR to mobilize the ‘atomic energy paradigm’, then perhaps Tesla might have enabled just such a program for ‘energy from the active medium’ known as Energy From The Vacuum or ZPE (Zero-Point-Energy).
Anyway, he didn’t show up for his meeting with the President, because he was found dead in his apartment from “natural causes”.
A Yugoslavian film on Nikola Tesla called “The Secret of Nikola Tesla” states that he had been poisoned; and there is an understanding that his paranoia of poisoning was not paranoia, but premonition. More likely, it may have been a logical supposition based on previous personal experiences.
For National Security reasons it was alleged that nobody was to know that the Coroner’s report had indicated he had been poisoned. The original death certificate would be an interesting document to retrieve.
Scalar Waves as a Free Non-Polluting Energy Source
Some of Tesla’s inventions were dangerous. Not only did he discover scalar waves – as theorized by James Clerk Maxwell in 1865 in his theory of electromagnetic radiation – and how to use the scalar longitudinal energy to manufacture earthquakes, but also he created a ‘Death Ray’, which has been likened to a particle beam weapon which can shoot a laser one thousand miles into space.
Zero point energy means that even if one froze the entire universe down to zero – all motion etc., everything to the far reaches of outer space – that rather than emptiness or the vacuum, there is really a seething cauldron of quantum energy or zero point energy still there. So much for the vacuum of space if quantum theory is correct.
This theoretical observation was discovered in the middle of last century by physists like Harold E. Puthoff, Alfonso Rueda and Bernard Haisch amoung others. And it is predicted by the mathematics of quantum theory that the figures are so large that there is enough energy in the volume of a coffee cup, for instance, to evaporate the world’s oceans. So it was thought it must be some kind of an artifact of the theory.
How Tesla’s Scalar Energy Technology is Being Used
Unacknowledged projects that use zero point energy are called black projects. And most so-called “UFO” sightings today belong to the black projects.
Dr Steven Greer — National Press Club Event – Disclosure Project – May 9, 2001 – Washington, DC
Dr Steven Greer The Deep National Security State 1/8 – November 2015
Harnessing the Hutchison Effect otherwise you don’t get overunity.
Such technology would mean the end of oil, gas, coal, internal combustion engines, rocket and jet engines, centralized utilities, solar panels and windmills (which are 18th century or earlier technology anyway).
But because energy is the basis of economic growth and economic growth depends on our debt-economy which means that all governments must be in debt to the black sun worshippers for the economy to be in ‘balance’, then we can never experience sustainability of the kind that free non-polluting energy can provide.
The reason is not a technical or scientific issue, but a social and macro economic and geo political problem, because the unacknowledged projects are ruthlessly suppressed by the black sun worshipers who rule the world and who are controlled by greed and power.
The late Ben Robert Rich (1925-1995) who was the second director (1975 to 1991) of Lockheed Corp.’s top-secret research and development unit known as the “Skunk Works” said Nicola Tesla and Thomas Townsend Brown‘s theories are kept in a black box by the black sun worshippers.
Rich said it would take an act of God to get them away from the black sun worshippers to benefit humanity. And since everything is part of the one event, perhaps we all need to be part of that act of God so it can be achieved.
Otherwise, all we are left with after our trillions of carbon dollars have been paid to the black sun worshippers, are the following highly greenhouse gas polluting and landfill polluting technologies that are being touted as the solutions to global warming caused by greenhouse gases. Are we really so stupid as to fall for that?
So-Called Green Renewable Energy Possibilities Today
Since energy is the basis of economic growth, and so-called “climate change” is linked via greenhouse gases causing a planetary environmental so-called “catastrophe”, so obviously electric energy produced by coal, natural gas, petroleum, biomass and waste burning or even from solar panels or wind turbines that require huge amounts of toxic chemicals to produce initially and then produce prodigious amounts of greenhouse gas and landfill pollution, may not be the answer.
As electricity is currently being produced it is definitely not a green solution. Yet we are being forced to substitute coal production of electricity with even more potentially environmentally harmful alternatives like solar panels and wind turbines and biomass and waste burning without any studies to support the efficacy of the switch.
Solar Panels as an Alternative to Coal Burning
National Geographic reported on November 12, 2014: “Fabricating the panels requires caustic chemicals such as sodium hydroxide and hydrofluoric acid, and the process uses water as well as electricity, the production of which emits greenhouse gases. It also creates waste. These problems could undercut solar’s ability to fight climate change and reduce environmental toxics”.
The generation of electricity from fossil fuel, biomass or waste burning has been known to cause important damages to ecosystems and human health. Combustion gases produced from burning them are:
- Carbon dioxide (CO2)
- Carbon monoxide (CO)
- Sulfur dioxide (SO2)
- Nitrogen oxides (NOx)
- Particulate matter (PM)
- Heavy metals such as mercury
But, as already mentioned, solar panels don’t fare any better and it could be said they fare even worse. Again, according to Forbes Magazine more than 2 years ago, regarding the problem of solar panel disposal, and which is quoting a senior Chinese solar official, a 40-year veteran of the U.S. solar industry, and research scientists with the German Stuttgart Institute for Photovoltaics, the problem of solar panel disposal “will explode with full force in two or three decades and wreck the environment” because it “is a huge amount of waste and they are not easy to recycle”. He says: “Contrary to previous assumptions, pollutants such as lead or carcinogenic cadmium can be almost completely washed out of the fragments of solar modules over a period of several months, for example by rainwater”.
So the manufacture of solar panels is a highly toxic and greenhouse gas producing process, not to mention the 10-20 short life and toxic leaching into the landfills when buried; and yet it is being touted as one of the solutions to greenhouse gas. Of course, it is anything but, and is a perfect example of fake news.
Although the touted alternatives are substantially more toxic than coal, it cannot be disputed that solar panels and wind turbines are a better economic solution in terms of cost of production being near stratospheric. In other words, causing massive debt to prop up the debt-economy.
Do Wind Turbines Produce Green Electric Energy?
“The wind turbine blade will be there, ultimately, forever,” Bob Cappadona, chief operating officer for the North American unit of Paris-based Veolia Environnement SA
Turbine blades can last up to 20 years, but many are taken down after just 10 so they can be replaced with bigger and more powerful designs.
A wind turbine’s blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, and they are piling up in landfills. Built to withstand hurricane-force winds, the blades can’t easily be crushed, recycled or repurposed. Hence, we see landfills being clogged with them worldwide.
Energy the Basis of Economic Growth
The world economy is based on ever-increasing population, a model which requires almost unlimited energy, which is unsustainable using current so-called “green solutions” for energy production just for starters.
And, after climate change has shown itself in its true colours, which they say is/was caused by us, their next mantra will be the need to save the world from “population explosion”: the very population growth necessary for their economic model to succeed – but which will again be all our “fault”.
Since energy is the basis of economic growth and solar panels have an 8% efficiency and are built to last 10 years using huge amounts of coal or equally polluting biomass or waste burning to create the silicon used in the panels, they are an excellent candidate for economic growth.
As well, solar panels’ fabrication requires caustic chemicals such as sodium hydroxide and hydrofluoric acid, and the process uses water as well as electricity, the production of which emits greenhouse gases.
Then there is the problem of solar panel disposal which “will explode with full force in two or three decades and wreck the environment”. So they can hardly be considered a green solution.
More efficient solar panels like NASA uses on Mars cost 1,000,000 a square inch.
Wind turbines fare no better and possibly even worse. Not only do they cause massive toxic reactions during their production, they also cause visual pollution and bird death above ground. But when they live out their short 10-20 year lifespan they foul the ecosystem below ground, for many thousands of years.
The only thing green about the renewable energy solutions on offer is the money it makes for the elite who are controlling the narrative regarding climate change which is said to be the reason for the need for green solutions.
Talk about kicking the can down the road.