Big Bang Cosmology – Religion not Science

Big Bang Cosmology has Religious Origins – but not Scientific

“Big Bang” was coined by the British astronomer, Sir Fred Hoyle in 1949. But he never accepted big bang cosmology from the start. Hoyle considered galaxy formation one of the big bang cosmology’s greatest weaknesses and preferred a cosmology based on what he called a steady-state model.

The big bang idea seemed to me to be unsatisfactory even before detailed examination showed that it leads to serious difficulties. Fred Hoyle

The Crisis in Cosmology

Cosmology is the umbrella under which all of science and our culture operates. It must apply to any question that can be asked. But it is easy to find a wealth of suppressed information which contradicts and debunks the seriously flawed theoretical gravitation based big bang cosmogony which is taught in academia.

Monsignor Georges LeMaître is seen here with Dr. Albert Einstein at the California Institute of Technology in 1933.
Bettmann Archive / Getty Images

The key ideas for the big bang cosmology go back decades earlier than 1947 to 1927 when cosmologist Georges Lemaître, (1894 — 1966) “discovered” that the universe is expanding , which he derived from general relativity theory which uses gravity to explain gravity. Of course, this is why Einstein is considered wrong about general relativity by many modern day physicists.

Einstein Rings Theory Crushed by Dr Dowdye

Religions Origins of Big Bang Cosmology

Once upon a time, long, long ago, there was nothing, which exploded.

According to the myth, we have nothing doing something. In other words, we have abandoned the principles of physics. This is according to Prof Lawrence M Krauss in his book “A Universe from Nothing“.

The creator of the big bang myth, Georges LeMaître, was a Jesuit-educated Belgian Catholic priest, mathematician, astronomer, and professor of physics at the Catholic University of Louvain.

In the Beginning was the Big Bang?

It was in 1931 that LeMaître proposed that the universe began with a “single quantum” – initially calling it the “hypothesis of the primeval atom” — but what we now call the big bang. This theory holds that the universe began in a cataclysmic explosion of a small, primeval “super-atom” which has no mass, and it continues to expand.

The expansion is based on the Hubbble-leMaître redshift theory. However, this theory was debunked by Hubble’s assistant Halton Arp (1927 – 2013), when he found that quasars populate the regions around spiral galaxies, and he showed definitively that they do not follow the Hubble Law, unlike most other objects.

Arp said that if Hubble had been first given the plots for quasars, he and other astronomers would never have concluded that the Universe was expanding. But on the strength of his findings he was subsequently banned from further access to telescopes owned by the 0.0000001%, or around eight (8) people of the 1% who have always ruled the world.

So, LeMaître was the cosmologist who formulated the modern big bang cosmology which has resulted in the €21 billion Large Hadron SuperCollider (~$23.5 Million USD) proposed to supersede the ~$13.25 Million USD Large Hardon Collider (LHC) because the LHC / CERN has not produced any new knowledge since the 1980’s.[1]

LeMaître’s big bang cosmology fits with the religious belief that the universe was created by God in a single instant out of “nothing” or a singularity. So the current cosmology is that everything was created out of nothing by God 13.8 billion years ago and requires the same kind of faith as the rest of religious dogmas.

Big Bang Cosmology Endlessly Contradicted

The countless discoveries that contradict or undermine big bang cosmology confirm that modern cosmology is not science, but merely a story based on religious beliefs.

The Herouni Antenna – the Death of the Big Bang!

And the story gets more and more complicated as it progresses, requiring the invention of dark energy, “dark matter” and black holes which are simply mathematical equations which require WIMPS (Weakly interacting massive particles), for instance. But WIMPS require supersymmetry and all predictions that supersymmetry works have failed.

Another instance of failure of the big bang theory regards the timeline of when God allegedly created the universe. There are stars, and one of which is HD 140283, known as Methuselah star, which is only 190 light years away from us, but which pre dates the 13.8 billion year creation myth. It is alleged to be between 14.5 and 16 billion years old.

The cosmic Timeline is Wrong

According to Plasma Cosmology, and supported by Wal Thornhill’s Electric Universe Theory, its time to wipe the chalkboard clean.

Plasma Cosmology Supersedes Big Bang Cosmology

99.999% of the visible universe is in the plasma state according to scientists such as Dr. Dennis Gallagher, a plasma physicist at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center. Plasma is the state where electrons have been stripped from some atoms – in other words, it is ionised.

And while it responds to electromagnetic fields, unlike solids, liquids and gases, however, it is not a super-conductor. Yet plasma physics and astronomers treat it as though it is. They say it attracts magnetic fields, but only a super conductor can do that.

The plasma state, or so-called 4th state of matter, is before the positive and negative charges organize themselves into atoms, and so might more correctly be called the 1st state of matter.

In some ways it is like a metal where the electrons are free to move, and that makes plasma an excellent electrical conductor. But, a charged plasma has only a small excess of negative or positive charge. So, although plasma is more conductive than copper, as already mentioned, it is not a superconductor.

Electric Universe Cosmology vs Big Bang Cosmology

…all modelling that ignores the electrical nature of matter and the universe [is] worthless. Wal Thornhill, Scientist, Author, Voice of the EU

Confirmed Birkeland plasma currents
Confirmed Birkeland plasma currents in our solar system connecting the planets to the sun. Is this evidence of an Electric Universe?

According to an alternative Cosmology viz. the Electric Universe Cosmology, moving plasma generates electric currents and forms current sheets, filaments, bubbles and importantly double layers which recent observations have shown occur in the Universe. These double layers are known as Birkeland currents.
This planetary nebula PN M2-9 imaged by NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope in 2015 shows the same kind of effects seen in low pressure gas discharge tubes.

Another instance in support of the electric cosmology is PN M2-9 nebula also called the Twin Jet Nebula, discovered by Rudolph Minkowski in 1947 and imaged by NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope in 2015. But there are many more such instances in Hubble’s Caldwell Catalog.

The fine filamentary structure of the PN M2-9 nebula is not explained by a stellar explosion but it is the form taken by electric current in plasma. The fact that the bipolar jets contract the further they are from the star proves they are not caused by an explosion.[2]

PN M2-9 shows the standard Z-Pinch Effect when pairs of Birkeland currents interact with themselves forming nebula. The fine filamentary structure of the nebula is not explained by a stellar explosion but is the form taken by electric current in plasma as already mentioned, and confirmed empirically countless thousands of times.

Rather than the image showing “the final stages of life for an old star”[3], the Z-Pinch is where new stars are formed. Observations show that when two filaments are drawn together they trigger star formation on the axis between the filaments.

not Big Bang Cosmology but Electrical Universe Cosmology
The Sun’s Environment.
Image courtesy Wal Thornhill

Astronomers have discovered that all galaxies rotate every billion years no matter how big they are. And they line up axially along Birkeland currents. Moreover, stars are born in and trace the power lines (Birkeland currents) and they are formed along them and powered by them.

In the Beginning was the Logos (Word)

So, was Hannes Alfvén wrong when he considered the notion that stars and galaxies generated electricity? It appears from observation that stars and galaxies are the load and not the generators. If that is the case, something else is powering the cosmos. And that something else is a generator.

Is the generator the “Word” or logos (logic) or consciousness like it says in the Bible? Is consciousness, or the ability to understand words or logic and process them/it, the electrical generator that powers the cosmos via photons that are capable of storing binary logic and that are carried in the plasma?


The hypothesis being put forward is that in the beginning was the word or logos (logic) or consciousness which is carried in the plasma to everything in creation. And since 99.999% of matter in the universe is composed of plasma which generates its own electrical energy, there is no need for the mathematical creation of mythical dark energy, dark matter, back holes, WIMPS or any other particles to explain anything, most especially gravity.

The universe is held together by the electric force which is generated in the moving plasma. In the same way, our bodies and all other phenomena are held together by the electric force in real time, or faster than the speed of light, which is actually quite slow. Tom van Flandern showed that the speed of gravity exceeds 20 billion times the speed of light and that was the lower limit he found.

If everything i.e. including our own bodies’ cells, were not all communicating and held together almost instantaneously, electrodynamically, we and everything else would all fly apart.

Gravity is a thousand billion billion billion billion times weaker than the electric force. It is 1039 of the electrostatic force, and yet it is said to be responsible for holding everything together in real time in a runaway big bang cosmology!

Only the 0.0000001% who rule the world via owning the banks, big pharma, education, the media, all religions etc. are in a position to get away with enforcing the big bang cosmology in academia; not-to-mention the world lockdown coronavirus Sars-CoV-2 scam, against all the evidence. I will cover the facts and possible motives for the worldwide Sars-CoV-2 known as the North Carolina virus or COVID-19 lockdown in my next blog next week, hopefully.