Do Plasma Electronics and not Gravity Govern the Universe?
Plasma Electronics and not gravity governs our universe, according to Plasma Physicists like Hannes Alfvén (2 May 1908 – 2 April 1995), Nobel Prize lauriet (1970).
Seventy years ago Alfvén predicted the inevitable death of Big Bang cosmology. This would mean the death of particle physics and with it materialism and therefore the lack of need for the $13.25 billion LHC (Large Hadron Collider).
But is the LHC more about Artificial Intelligence (AI) than particle physics, anyway?
Gravity’s Starring Role in Big Bang Theory
What does Gravity have to do with the Big Bang?
According to Sir Isaac Newton’s law of universal gravitation, gravity is an attractive force that acts on every particle of matter in the universe, coalescing everything into clumps. Wikipedia says: “Gravity, or gravitation, is a natural phenomenon by which all things with mass or energy—including planets, stars, galaxies, and even light — are brought toward one another.”
However, at the same time as gravity is supposedly pulling everything together, we have a popular contradictory theory that says so-called dark energy is pulling everything apart at an exponential rate that cannot be explained by any known physics. This rapidly expanding universe hypothesis is based on Hubble’s redshift theory.
Redshift Predicts an Expanding Universe?
Edwin Hubble (20/11/1889 – 28/09/1953) noticed that objects observed in deep space — extragalactic space, 10 megaparsecs or more — are found to have a redshift. He interpreted this as a relative velocity away from Earth. This Doppler shift, or measured velocity of various galaxies receding from the Earth, is approximately proportional to their distance from the Earth, for galaxies up to a few hundred megaparsecs away. This is the basis of his theory for a rapidly expanding universe.
Edwin Hubble’s constant H for the rate of expansion of the universe: h = H100 km/s/Mpc is what makes him one of the most important astronomers of all time. To honour his discovery, the Hubble Space Telescope was named for him and launched into low Earth orbit in 1990.
A Challenge to Big Bang Theory
Halton Arp (1927 – 2013) was Edwin Hubble’s assistant. He found that quasars populate the regions around spiral galaxies, and they do not follow the Hubble Law, unlike most other objects. If one plots their brightness against their redshifts as one does for galaxies, one gets an unexpected scatter on the diagram.
Also, there is no indication that they are at their proposed redshift distances. It is argued that if Hubble had been first given the plots for quasars, he and other astronomers would never have concluded that the Universe was expanding.
Dr Arp found that galaxies with radically different redshifts, and thus at vastly different distances from us, often appeared connected by filaments and bridges of gas. This suggested, he said, that redshift was not always an indication of distance but could be caused by other, unknown physics. 
Shown above is one of the most impressive finds: a quasarlike object known as Markarian 205, which had a redshift corresponding to a distance of about a billion light years but appeared to be in front of a galaxy only 70 million light years away.
Halton Arp is sometimes referred to as the modern-day Galilei. His discoveries showed how “redshifts” failed big bang predictions, and developed the idea of pulling gravity vs. pushing gravity in cosmic terms to describe dark matter.
Like Galileo, he has used the modern-day telescope to overturn antiquated cosmology. Like Galileo, the high priests of orthodoxy who are “owned” by the Luciferian elite, refused to look at his results and he had been denied the right to publish them. Like Galileo he had been punished, in his case by being denied access to the telescopes he had used to make his discoveries. And like Galileo, Halton Arp will have the last laugh, most modern-day, non-Luciferian theorists believe.
Plasma Electronics vs. Dark Matter and Dark Energy
Decades ago, the problem of an inexplicably exponential expansion was noticed and it led to the invention of an hypothetical new type of energy called “dark energy”.
Scientists tell us so-called dark energy comprises 75% of the universe in order to explain the inexplicable.
But, at least one physicist, Massimo Villata of the National Institute for Astrophysics (INAF) in Pino Torinese, Italy, describes dark energy as “embarrassing,” saying that the concept is an ad hoc element to standard cosmology and is devoid of any physical meaning.
Plasma cosmology (PC) and the electric universe (EU) have always claimed there was no big bang, and so have no need to explain the inexplicable.
Still Chasing Dark Matter
Astronomers have been hunting for Dark Matter for 86 years. “If dark matter does interact through Higgs intermediaries, then this should affect—in a reverse sense—how Higgs bosons decay. Specifically, some fraction of Higgs bosons created in the LHC should decay into dark matter particles, which would escape detection.” 
Tenured scientists are required to go along with dark matter and black holes as being 95% of our universe, but which escape detection.
So they have come up with a lot of names for their illusory dark matter that escapes detection. Strongly self-interacting Dark Matter (SIDM), Repulsive Dark Matter, Self-annihilating Dark Matter, Fuzzy Dark Matter, Weakly Interacting Massive Particles WIMPs, Very Light Weakly Interacting Particles, Axions, and on and on and on.
So far it has cost $13.25 billion to find nothing, if we just concentrate on the cost to run the LHC, even though dark matter and dark energy is said to comprise 95% of our galaxy.
The Higgs boson, which is being sought by the LHC, is said to help explain how particles obtain mass, hypothetically speaking. In that way, we can continue with the materialism delusion.
Obviously, no amount of our money is too much for the ruling elite to spend on this kind of nonsensical cover-up. One has to wonder why? Perhaps it is to convince us of its possible reality because in the eyes of our top paid scientists, whose pensions depend on the lie, that it is a feasibility and therefore valid? But it probably goes a lot deeper than that. The Luciferian elite are nothing if not stunningly devious.
Is the Realization of a Plasma Electronics Happening in Real Time?
Halton Arp has enlightened us on the redshift’s reality, and therefore the hoax of the big bang hypothesis. And now we are experiencing the painfully slow demise of particle physics, and especially dark matter, in preference to plasma physics or plasma electronics.
So, as I write, an article has appeared in The Daily Galaxy dated 11 June, 2019 titled “The Magnetic Cosmos”“. In it John Terning, theoretical physicist and professor of physics at UC Davis, University of California is calling for an alternative to the WIMP (Weakly Interacting Massive Particle) model of dark matter. He says the observed phenomena “calls for a form of ‘dark electromagnetism’ including ‘dark photons’ and other particles”.
But of course, normal non-dark electromagnetism does not need to be ‘dark’ and explains the observed phenomena in repeatable laboratory experiments.
In post-modern physics, there are no such things as a separate electric field and a separate magnetic field. What causes a free electrical body to move or translate is the electromagnetic field and what causes the electrons in the magnet to spin is the electromagnetic field.
Why There Are No Magnetic Monopoles in the Universe | Echa and Science
Electric Force explains Gravity
As early as 1981 Ralph Sansbury was asking Do Gravity and Magnetism have a Common Cause?
Both PC and EU proponents acknowledge the fact that space is NOT electrically neutral, a fact largely denied in conventional astronomy.
For PC and EU proponents the proof of a Plasma Electronics Universe and not a gravity centric one is in part derived from the fact that the force of gravity is a thousand billion billion billion billion times weaker than the electric force.
Gravity is 10-39 the electrostatic force which is why we can leap into the air (if only for a second or so) and the earth cannot prevent it. (Note: 10−39 equals 1/1039, where 1039 is 1 followed by 39 zeros.)
Gravity – the Weakest Force in the Universe
It is an outrageous idea that gravity can overcome electrical forces within atoms that are 1,000 billion billion billion billion times stronger than gravity.
But getting back to our antiquated, post modern physics that is endorsed by the high priests of orthodoxy; Albert Einstein built on Newton’s findings with his general theory of relativity.
Among other things, this theory explained gravity not as a force but as a distortion in the shape of space-time. He was using gravity to explain gravity in his theory of general relativity which explains why it is invalid, according to some modern day physicists.
Even with Milgrom’s 1983 Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) it was still incapable of describing observed reality.
So-called “spooky, non-local” quantum effects are due to instantaneous resonant transfer of information between subatomic particles via the Longitudinal Electric Force (the truncated part of Maxwell’s equations of electromagnetism) which was truncated because it’s taboo thinking.
None-the-less, coherence is necessary at all scales i.e. the atomic, the molecular, the planetary, the stellar and the galactic scales. They all require a near-infinite speed of electrical interaction to prevent everything flying apart.
Discordant Data from Hubble Space Telescope
Last month, a study based on data from the Hubble Space Telescope was published dated April 26, 2019. It confirms what many other papers have reported in recent years. That is, that the theoretical “expansion of the universe” following the hypothetical “big bang explosion” is accelerating much too quickly to be explained through any kind of known physics.
Plasma Electronics Predicts Solid State Cosmos
But in a cosmos governed by plasma electronics and not gravity the universe is balanced, Arp proposes. It is not expanding- which cannot happen if gravity is pulling everything together, anyway. It is not contracting because gravity on the cosmic scale is repulsive, he theorized from his empirical observations made before he was denied access to the telescopes.
Electro-dynamics – not Gravity – Already Understood in 19th Century
We stand on the verge of a vast cosmical discovery such as nothing hitherto imagined can compare with.”
Sir John Herschel 1850
As early as the 19th Century Sir John Herschel (1792 – 1871) discovered the link between magnetic storms on Earth and sunspots, and around that time Michael Faraday (1791-1867) investigated the links between electricity and magnetism. The resistance against electro-dynamics or plasma electronics by the 1% who control our world is immense. But why?
Ring Currents Rule The Cosmos – not Gravity
Nature can’t stop itself from producing ring currents in a plasma electronics governed universe. They exist at the atomic level, the molecular level, the planetary level, the stellar level and the galactic level of our cosmos.
Ring currents have a vortex structure that explains away ancient Newtonian gravitational theories, and Kepler’s Laws of Planetary motion. But it confirms observed science like the Russian torsion field experiments, and other 5th state plasma electronics experiments.
For instance, according to A. D. Hall, what we see as lightening is a dielectric breakdown which occurs when the voltage applied to any capacitor exceeds its capacity to store charge on the plates, or in the case of lightening, on the layer of air between the cloud and the ground. The dielectric, or layer of air, fails to resist the electric field across it and it sparks.
An ionized channel develops in the dielectric and the built up charge on the layers suddenly dumps through the channel formed. We see the discharge as almost instantaneous but in reality there is a period prior when the dielectric absorbs charge and builds the ionized channel. Charge has to defuse through the dielectric before the channel forms and connects the plates – or layer of air between the cloud and ground in the case of lightening.
In storms on earth the same looping current flows (ring currents) are in the form of weak plasma winds because the atmosphere is only partially ionized on earth.
Is Plasma Cosmology and not Gravity-centric Cosmology the Answer?
The gravity of the Electric Universe Theory | 99.99% is Plasma |
Plasma cosmology is a model of the universe which recognizes the undeniable significance of plasma and the electromagnetic force in the Cosmos.
Diametrically opposed is a gravity centric cosmology which cannot explain the pervasive and well ordered cosmic magnetic fields which are recognized but not explained by it, and not even predicted by a gravity centric cosmology.
As noted in the above video, the plasma paradigm is higher than the gravity one in that it encompasses a larger domain of evidence. Not only does it explain more phenomena, it explains them with a comprehensive and unitary theory. It sees more landscape, more features of the landscape and more relationships among those features.
Gravity, in contrast sees fewer features and sees them as disparate events, each requiring a separate and hoc explanation. For example every feature on every planet has its own theory, and they all fail to account for details intrinsic in the plasma view.
The Plasma Universe
It has been proposed for centuries that at the centre of galaxies is not black holes but a physically real object which is produced and observed in laboratories, called a plasmoid. W. H. Bostick 1916-1991
According to plasma electronics, a black hole is an ultra high density storage phenomenon called a plasmoid which is a kind of load in the galactic energy circuit.
On 4th May, 2019 we were shown an animated gif with the heading “We may have detected Gravitational Waves from a black hole devouring a Neutron Star”
Interestingly, that animated gif was replaced next day with a non-animated gif (shown), and then with a totally different image the day after that.
But I found one of the early images, albeit frozen, that is meant to show gravitational waves from a black hole. The animated version was interesting in that the escaping jet stream discharged along the galaxy’s spin axis just the way a simulated plasmoid ejecting a load is observed in multiple laboratory experiments already undertaken.
Of course, it is also extremely interesting that the jet was escaping from a black hole, since the density of a theoretical black hole is said to preclude any escape of anything. Hence the rapid switching of images, presumably.
When the plasmoid reaches a threshold density it discharges, usually along a galaxy’s spin axis which was obvious on the aforementioned animated gif that only lasted a day before being eventually replaced two days later by a rather non-sensical image (see previous link).
As usual, scientists are left to ponder the undeniable electrical phenomena with little hope of resolving the undeniable cause.
Black hole theory is based on gravity theory which is based on Einstein’s general relativity theory.
Continuous Creation from Electric Plasma versus Big Bang Universe
Plasma cosmologists don’t deal with infinities because they have no need to. You are no longer talking physics when you introduce infinity because it is a concept, not a thing or a number. You can’t use it in mathematics, but it is often used in big bang theory, black holes and AI singularity.
The electric force is so much more powerful than gravity which requires infinities. You can ignore gravity or you can include it, and it makes no difference in high powered super computer simulations.
Recently, an article appeared showing star formation burst in the Milky Way 2-3 billion years ago. If this is the way the universe is then that puts an end to the idea that everything originated out of nothing in the mythical Big Bang.
Its hard to imagine how our world paradigm would expand exponentially if the people who own the world allowed the truth about plasma electronics or the electro-dynamic universe to become a legitimized field of study, outside of it’s current classified environment.
At present, it is considered by our Luciferian rulers to be a “kook conspiracy” peddled by “woo-peddlers” or “physics cranks” or any other of their favourite derisive phrases when it is outside of their controlled “legitimacy”.
Of course, allowing it to be common knowledge would mean they would be seriously curtailed in using our tax dollars which, to date, amounts to $13.25 Billion for the LHC (Large Hadron Collider) and obviously heaps more of for the other AI Singularity endeavours around the world. So we can kiss that idea goodbye.
That is, unless we the 99%, decide to take a peaceful stand against the Luciferian elite. And because everything is energy, all that would mean would be waking up sufficiently to refuse to buy into their lies anymore.
 Intrinsic Redshifts in Quasars and Galaxies Abstract
 Markian 205 Discordancy Report
Connecting Higgs to Dark Matter